David Kastrup wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > John Hasler wrote: > > [...] > >> you see fit. It is only the work consisting of a combination of > >> your work and a GPL work that may only be distributed under the > >> GPL. > > > > Sez who? See "mere aggregation" clause in the GPL, retard. > > The problem with your argumentation is that you think _every_ > combination of code a "mere aggregation". That is not the case, > however, and courts as well as jurisdiction are well aware of the > difference.
So why don't you drop a link or cite some ruling? regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
