mike4ty4 writes: > If you then use some of your original code from said combined work (and > it's been said here REPEATEDLY that your original code is yours) in > another 100% original work, that also becomes GPL...
It does no such thing. Please read up on Troll Tech and Qt. > 1. Make non-GPL program. > 2. Combine a little bit of someone else's GPL program. > 3. Release the _combined work_ under GPL. > 4. Take a bit of my _original work_ from the *original* > part of said combined work and put it in another > original work, this time one with NObody else's code > in it, > 5. Release that closed-source and non-GPL as heck. > Am I right? Yes, as we have been trying to tell you for some time. > Now, does this have and bearing on what I can do with my original works? Nothing. > Can I let someone use _my own_ 100% original code in their works WITHOUT > demanding them to give me their own code for my use? Yes, of course. > I should be able to, considering those are _my original works_ and I can > do WHATEVER I PLEASE WITH THEM since *I* made them! Am I right? Yes, as we have been trying to tell you for some time. > Aha! Thank you for confirming me. I've uncovered it! The "evil motive" of > the GPL! The GPL is just a document: a model license. It is not capable of having motives. > I now am unable to use any of my own code from that project in any future > projects without making them GPL as well or SOMEBODY ELSE could crack > down on me for "violating" "their" rights for using MY OWN CODE!!!! This is _not true_. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI USA _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
