Richard Tobin wrote: > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > buyer's cost to obtain = 0 (per GPL "no charge" provision) > > > > seller's cost to create = programmer's salary, energy, etc. > > > >So where is a profit, dak?
Profit = buyer's cost to obtain - seller's cost to create > > There seems to be a substantial profit for the "buyer" here: they get > a program for nothing. I was talking about a profit for seller (creator of GPL derivative work), not commercial value of seller's created derivative work for buyer minus buyer's cost to obtain. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
