David Kastrup wrote: [...] > Warm and fuzzy does not work as a legally binding license. One has to > spell out all areas where "tit for tat" can be undermined to a fatal > degree.
You mean the FSF's crackpot theory regarding "based on" copyright derivation a la "Subclassing is creating a derivative work. Therefore, the terms of the GPL affect the whole program where you create a subclass of a GPL'ed class." spelled out in moronic GPL FAQ? regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
