"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Of course, contrary to ams' contention, the FSF can't just choose > to do whatever they want to with IBM's code: > > I never said that. IBM is the copyright holder of IBM's code, in > the case of GCC, it is not longer IBM's code, but the FSF's, since > IBM has transfered copyright to the FSF. So indeed, the FSF can do > whatever they would like with their code.
You are again snipping sentences into parts that make no sense on their own, then pretend that the explanation you snipped does not exist. If you can't make a sensible reply to a sentence as written, these antics rather weaken your point. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
