Qua, 2006-09-27 às 14:59 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu: > Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > [...] > > Just look at Linus and the other kernel developers who abided to > > BitKeeper, until the owners of that proprietary software decided to pull > > the plug after a Free Software author found a way to free people from > > BitKeeper. > > Tridgell didn't found a way to free people from BitKeeper, mini-RMS. > > He tried to find a way to free www.bitkeeper.com from its business of > selling clients with his castrated bitkeeper client clone wannabe > called "SourcePuller" (note also that linux developers had both > repository servers and clients for free), not only repository servers. > > McVoy then yanked free of charge friends editions in response.
LOL that's a really funny way of expressing your "proteccionism" point of view, Alex. So a company has a business that depends on a morally questionable method (basically holding hostage people's file evolution history) to make money, and by a design mistake leaves an open door for people to escape that cage. This is quite easy to compare with DVD's CSS: DVDForum has a business that depends on a morally questionable method (basically holding a film hostage to a zone and some weak encryption) to make money, and by a design mistake leaves an open door for people to escape that cage. DVDForum's luck was that there's DMCA, EUCD, etc... McVoy's out of luck since fortunately there isn't *yet* a governmental proteccionism that would help him pillage users. McVoy then chose to punish people that had nothing to do with what Tridge did, providing Free Software proponents with yet another "I told you so" magical moment. Rui
signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
_______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
