Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [...] >> what about the case I am interested, linking GPL liensed dynamic >> library to program. What now? >> >> Do you know at least one court case of this? > > I don't. I also don't know of "at least" one case regarding black > being not white. So what?
There is no money to be made with such a case, which seems to make a difference. > Hey, if someone makes utterly idiotic claims, why don't you simply > suggest to that idiot to prove it in court of law? The glibc is > *your* defence. It is not even licensed under the GPL, so it would be hard to see how it could be used as a defense in a GPL case. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
