David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > "Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote:
> > [...]
> >> >From offical dutites, yes, because Thomas went against the policies of
> >> the GNU project (outright refusing to use the GFDL in a GNU project
> >
> > Interesting. So much about GNU freedom of speech.
>
> As the maintainer of a GNU project, one is responsible for
> implementing the GNU policies. That's not a matter of freedom of
^
|
Grand-Imperator's ----+ (aka GNU President)
And what exactly did Bushnell failed to implement apart from voicing
dissent regarding (un)freeness of the GFDL?
regards,
alexander.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
