In comp.os.linux.advocacy, James White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 12 Nov 2006 11:12:51 -0500 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > First, you don't even understand what Web 2.0 means.
I wish *I* knew what the term "Web 2.0" means. So far, I can identify pieces: AJAX, Javascript, DHTML. Flash is part of Web 1.5 (which is Web 1.0 + plugins), or perhaps I'm just confused at this point, but I doubt I'm the only one. At a very high level, the user just clicks or double-clicks on something and things automagically happen. Some of them may be local (Notepad), some of them Web-related (the browser proper), some of them might be a combination of Web and AJAX (I don't know precisely what they're doing but Yahoo!'s quotes page now shows trades as they are broadcast/recorded, for example). > Second you've never > even heard of accessibility standards. An important issue to consider in this Brave New Web(tm). :-) > And third you're clearly unaware of > even the most minimal standards for "active pages." But, you've got a great > educational start so I heartily congratulate you on what you've accomplished > and encourage you to take it to the next level---just don't call it Web 2.0. > -- #191, [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!" - Monty Python and the Holy Grail -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
