In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Without acceptance, an act of creating a derivative work (forget >17 USC 117 adaptations for a moment) is a copyright violation, >distribution or no distribution. >An author of a derivative work who accepts the GPL has copyright in a >derivative work but is required to surrender a right to charge more >than zero for derivative work. So without accepting the GPL, you have no right to create a derivative work, but you have the right to licence, for a charge, the work you can't create? Just how would you go about exercising this mythical right? -- Richard -- "Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
