David Kastrup wrote: > "Dmitry V. Gorbatovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: >> >>> Not much to thanks about, since I am really looking for possible >>> solution/help, not just cheerful exchange of obvious statements. >>> >>> None of these statements are obvious. If you felt that your message >>> was misunderstood, please clarify that. What is it exactly that you >>> wish to do then? >> Summarizing, the main intention is share code , but not patent. >> So anybody can use the code and method for their own private >> needs (including derivative works) and even share it with "neighbor". >> But "public use" should be constrained by patent law. > > "anybody" and "public" are not separable. > In this case separated terms is "public" and "private".
Dmitry _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
