On 2006-12-28, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Qui, 2006-12-28 =C3=A0s 12:13 +0000, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra escreveu: >> criteria. Nevertheless, the software component can't be patented, as >> declared in most countries patent law (only a few, like the US, are in >> violation of TRIPS, at least according to my interpretation which sees >> software delegated to Berne Convention, and Berne Convention delegates >> it do Droit d'Auteur/Copyright). > > As it seems some people still have doubts about the quite clear text:
There's quite clear text in TRIPS? > It doesn't say "shall be protected as you please". Nor does it say "shall ONLY be protected". Why do you think it does? Merijn -- Remove +nospam to reply _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
