can we all please stop talking in parables and references to topics we may not all share the detailed background knowledge of? I'd like a straight answer with the entire answer within the text.
is the GPL basically not enforceable assuming you "work around" it technically by the aforementioned method? Am i strange in thinking that this is strange? What I glean is, yes i can, from the user's perspective, "include" a GPL'd software within my own proprietary software, and NOT be forced to release my source code? (see previous for what i mean by "include") _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
