In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You may try to state that under your contract "mere aggregation" (in >GNU speak) triggers the same obligations as derivative work and that >it encompassing all works in a compilation/aggregation. I don't want to prevent *real* mere aggregation. What I want to prevent is someone using it in another program without licensing that program in the same way. >Then you just >hope that it can withstand challenges under doctrines of preemption, >misuse, and whatnot (such as lack of contract formation and >distribution under 17 USC 109/117 instead, etc.). It sounds as though you don't think I should be able to restrict my software in this way. Why not? -- Richard -- "Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
