In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But the GPL only covers distribution. Even if the original author has >> some of the responsibility for the act of creating the derivative >> in-memory image, the GPL does not apply to that act. If you don't >> distribute the derivative work, where does the GPL come into it? >The original author might be found liable for contributory infringement. On the face of it, no-one has distributed a derivative work, so that there is no infringement to contribute to. But David's theory that the two acts together constitute distribution might be correct. -- Richard -- "Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
