[EMAIL PROTECTED](none) (Byron Jeff) writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> mike3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Here's the scenario:
>>
>>I have two programs, a GPL program and my own program, to which I
>>myself own the copyrights.
>
> The point is moot then. If you own the copyrights, you can do anything
> you like with the programs. Copyright is always about what rights the
> non copyright owner has, not the copyright owner.
>
>>Now, I take a couple of pieces of the GPL program and install them in
>>my own program,
>
> You've already stated that they are both your own program...
>
> "[both], to which I myself own the copyrights."
[...]
I think what he meant was:
I have two programs,
a GPL program
and
my own program, to which I myself own the copyrights.
But the phrasing was ambiguous, and the use of "copyrights" rather
than "copyright" could easily imply that it applies to both programs.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
