Although I agree in concept and ethics with all the concepts expressed here, I still don't get the point: AFAIK, at least in the EU, I hold copyright of whatever thing my mind produces. It has nothing to do with being functional or whatever. It's just if I make it, it's mine. So, why distributing non-GPL code alone, which to be functional would need to be linked against GPLed code, should be a copyright infringment? What if I said "Look! This is my attempt to post-modern-digital poetry." or whatever...
This makes me confused.. paolino _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
