The saga: http://jmri.sourceforge.net/k/docket/
The ruling: http://jmri.sourceforge.net/k/docket/158.pdf One bit not mentioned in the news stories: Although Defendants represent that they have voluntarily ceased all potentially infringing activities utilizing any of the disputed material and although both parties conceded that the disputed material is no longer of value (as of March 2007), the Court cannot find as a matter of law that Defendants’ voluntary termination of allegedly wrongful activity renders the motion for preliminary injunction moot. “‘Voluntary cessation of challenged conduct moots a case ... only if it is absolutely clear that the alleged wrongful behavior would not reasonable be expected to recur.’” Once a criminal, always a criminal ;-) -- __________ |im |yler http://timtyler.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Remove lock to reply. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
