Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > reasonable and non-discriminatory != royalty free, to begin with.
It does when they have to not discriminate against Samba. ...but I do have to make one clarification. If Microsoft wanted a once-off payment for access to the specs, that could be ok so long as the amount is "reasonable". That wouldn't exclude Samba or other free software. -- Ciarán O'Riordan __________________ \ http://fsfeurope.org/projects/gplv3 http://ciaran.compsoc.com/ _________ \ GPLv3 and other work supported by http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/weblog \ Fellowship: http://www.fsfe.org _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
