[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bent C Dalager) writes: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Frank Goenninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>Well, I didn't start the discussion. So you should ask the OP about the >>why. I jumped in when I came across the so often mentioned "hey, it's >>all well defined" statement was brought in. I simply said that if that >>"well-definedness" is against "common understanding" then I don't give >>a damn about that clever definitions. Because I have to know that there >>are such definitions - always also knowing that free is not really >>free. > > "Liberated" is a valid meaning of the word "free".
No. It is a valid meaning of the word "freed". Xpost+Fup2 gnu.misc.discuss: this is not really relevant for most of the touched Usenet groups. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
