On Dec 7, 2:06 pm, "Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, so does this mean that the reason why GNU deserves credit > in the _name_ and not somewhere else is because GNU's contribution > is so significant -- they pretty much built most of the rest of the > system? > > The GNU project deserves credit not only because the GNU project wrote > the GNU operating system, but also because they named it. One does > not go about calling BSD for System V, despite them being very > similar.
I wasn't questioning that the GNU project deserved credit, I was wondering why the credit should be *in the name* -- note that well. Why is the **name** the proper place as opposed to somewhere else? _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
