rjack wrote: [... Affero GPL ...]
> If you're into the "copyleft" thing ask the people at the Free Sofware > Foundation http://www.fsf.org/licensing/ -- it'll be legal gibberish It would be real fun to watch FSF/SFLC "enforcing" GNU Affero*** given http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/2nd/039303p.pdf ***) http://www.fsf.org/agplv3-pr "Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, if you modify ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the Program, your modified version must prominently offer all users interacting with it remotely through a computer network (if your version supports such interaction) an opportunity to receive the Corresponding Source of your version by providing access to the Corresponding Source from a network server at no charge, through some standard or customary means of facilitating copying of software. This Corresponding Source shall include the Corresponding Source for any work covered by version 3 of the GNU General Public License that is incorporated pursuant to the following paragraph." regards, alexander. -- "Plaintiffs copyrights are unique and valuable property whose market value is impossible to assess" -- SOFTWARE FREEDOM LAW CENTER, INC. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
