On Jan 16, 8:13 am, "Koh Choon Lin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, so what situations are, and why is this not one of them? > > rms felt it ethical to use Unix when the purpose was to replace it. >
That makes sense. But I'm still curious about the situation I mentioned as the reason for this discussion. What exactly is the problem with "proprieting" the software if it's to protect the scientific validity of the data obtained from the project? Is it because there may be a way to achieve that goal without doing that? _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
