On Feb 1, 6:40 am, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mike3 writes: > > But if it's not Free, then how does that jive with "Gnutianism"'s moral/ > > ethical codes that says creating and using non-free/"proprietary" > > software is wrong? > > It doesn't. So what? Do you think one is required to sign an oath of > loyalty and obediance before being permitted to write Free Software?
No I didn't think that. The question was though, if we consider the creation and usage of non-free/"proprietary" software wrong, then by contributing to that creation by developing it it to get paid, isn't that also wrong? It would seem so to me. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
