Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Dustin Cook wrote: > [...] >> thiefed (hehehe) your car, you wouldn't have it anymore. If I copied >> it, you still have yours. How have I stolen yours then? > > http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070821/ANE01/70821 > 003/1172/ANE (Mercedes may sue over China Smart look-a-like) > > http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/9/story.cfm?c_id=9&objectid=10460954 > (Mercedes and BMW angry over Chinese knock-offs) > > http://creativeadvertisingworld.com/bmw-7-vs-byd-f6/ > (The Chinese fully ignore copyrights) > > regards, > alexander. > > -- > "Notwithstanding Jacobsen's confused discussion of unilateral > contracts, bilateral contracts, implied licenses, "licenses to the > world" and "bare" licenses in his Appellant's Brief, the issue at hand > is fairly simple." > > -- Brief of Appellees (CAFC 2008-1001). > Ah yes, the old look and feel debate. I don't agree with that concept either. -- Regards, Dustin Cook - http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk BugHunter v2.2e AntiMalware Removal Utility _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
