peterwn wrote: > > On Mar 18, 7:44 am, Tim Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK, this one confuses me. At first I thought there was no case against > > Verizon because they were just distributing boxes that they got from the > > other company. But they were also hosting firmware downloads. That's > > copying, isn't it? So doesn't that require Verizon to have permission > > of the copyright holder? > > > > Agreed that SFLC could theoretically sue Verizon, but obviously after
http://www.terekhov.de/GPLvVerizon/VOLUNTARY_DISMISSAL.pdf *WITH PREJUDICE* That means total defeat of SFLC/Plaintiffs. regards, alexander. -- http://linuxtaliban.com/bilder.htm _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
