Theres a program I'd like to use (SetACL.exe). Its licened with GPLv2. I've read most the of GNU FAQ's but still a little confused.
Basically, I have a commersial program. I want InstallShield to use SetACL.exe (GPLv2) to set ASPNET permissions on some registry settings so my programs ASPX config web page can edit these registry settings. This type of situation is okay with GPLv2 correct? Say I just have a folder "SetACL" and it has the "SetACL.exe" and the GPLv2 text file in it? Or since my software is being sold and distrubuited to people who buy it, would I be forced to put the source code of SetACL into the folder as well? Is the GNU Licence file even needed? IE Can I just put the SetACL.exe in a bin folder with the rest of my set-up exes? Its the origional version of the file, no modifcations on my part. If I'm including the licence file with SetACL.exe, woudln't it confuse some people as to what file that licence acts on (IE only SetACL.exe, nothing else). If someone could clear these up for me I'd be greatful :) NB _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
