Ivan Fomichev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I would like to license the software of my own under a free software > license. I've browsed many of them, but nothing meets my needs. The > license of my choice should be a) human-readable (opposing to lawyer- > readable ;-), b) weak copyleft,
What does "weak" mean for you? Your example is pretty much like "GPL" which is not generally considered "weak". > c) enforceable What is it that you want to enforce when you are talking about "weak"? > and d) GPL-compatible. I'd guess that the GPL is the best bet yet. While you probably object to it on base of not being "human-readable", it is certainly one of those licenses covered most extensively in discussions and FAQs, so humans have a lot of references to consult in case of doubt (including the legal department of the FSF). -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
