Barry Margolin wrote:
If Apple were considered a monopoly, I think there might be antitrust issues
(wasn't IBM forced many years ago to allow its mainframe OS to run on
competitors' hardware?). But Apple's market share is hardly large enough for
this to apply.
The situation is not clear-cut. This is an interesting link, see "Good Answers
(1)" contained in the link.
http://www.linkedin.com/answers/law-legal/corporate-law/antitrust-law/LAW_COR_ATL/215856-22003610?browseCategory=LAW_COR_ATL
Sincerely,
Rjack
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or
the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."
-- John Adams, 'Argument in Defense of the Soldiers in the Boston Massacre
Trials,' December 1770
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
