Hi Bruce, Below are my thoughts, but I can't be sure I've understood the situation, and I'm no lawyer anyway.
"Bruce C. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Say you take a project that is a server application, which is released > under the GPLv3, make some modifications to it and then make it > available on the internet for anyone to connect to. Under GPLv3, you would not have to make your modified source code available. What section of GPLv3 makes you think you would be required to make source available? (you might be right, I might have misunderstood the situation.) Under the Affero GPLv3 (another licence published by FSF), *if* the original software included functionality to allow web users to download the source code, then yes, you would be required to keep that functionality working. > This server > doesn't have a client component to it, so, it's similar to a web > application or something like that. > > If you were to rebrand your modified version as a new product Rebranding would not affect your obligations. Whether or not a client component exists probably also won't affect your obligations. -- Ciarán O'Riordan, +32 477 36 44 19, http://ciaran.compsoc.com/ Support free software, join FSFE's Fellowship: http://fsfe.org Recent blog entries: http://fsfe.org/en/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/using_latex_to_make_pdf_documents_with_japanese_characters http://fsfe.org/en/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/links_sean_daly_kde_swpat_chessboxing http://fsfe.org/en/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/links_india_pats_clipperz_freegis_rms_emacs http://fsfe.org/en/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/using_and_writing_emacs_22_input_methods _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
