Rjack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Context eh? > > I posted a link to the complete decision and you replied to my post, so > you would have access to the court's decision.
What did that decision have to do with the GPL? It was a completely different license. All that was required in that license was attribution (which they had failed to comply with) If it's the decision I'm thinking of anyway. -- | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a | | | graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit | | Andrew Halliwell BSc | operating system originally coded for a 4 bit | | in |microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that| | Computer Science | can't stand 1 bit of competition. | _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
