Hyman Rosen wrote: [...] > The GPL enforcement is already in existence.
I said *court* enforcement, Hyman. There was no court order to date (World Wide) enforcing the GPL, to my knowledge. Here's English language comprehension exercise for you that might help. http://ia301337.us.archive.org/1/items/EbenMoglenLectureEdinburghJune2007text/scl2007_eben_moglen.html Given (Eben Moglen says): "... private agreement can substantially oust public law institutions ..." Questions: 1. "private agreement" Is this known under the term "contract" or not? 2. "can substantially oust public law institutions" Is this humble objection (to "substantially oust public law institutions") ought to result in substantially unenforceable contract or not? What do you think, Hyman? regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
