Rjack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Since the Busybox default judgment didn't occur on a writ of error or >appeal, I don't see how the quoted fragment applies. <<
>Rahul, Rahul read and believe before you make a complete jackass >of yourself: [ a whole bunch of quotes from many cases ] Rjack, this is quite remarkable. You quote a Supreme Court case, and I point out that you spliced out the important context. So now you offer even more out-of-context quotes. And still no amicus brief. -- Rahul http://rahul.rahul.net/ _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
