Rjack wrote: > David Kastrup wrote: >> Rjack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Hyman Rosen wrote: >>>> Rjack wrote: >>>>> Now it gobbles up your compiler too. >>>>> To wit: A Practical Guide to GPL Compliance >>>>> http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2008/compliance-guide.html >>>> Witless is more like it, since the quoted passage explicitly >>>> says that the GPL does *not* gobble up your compiler. >>> >>> Quote: >>> >>> "If you have used a proprietary, third-party compiler to build the >>> software, then you probably cannot ship it to your customers." >>> >>> Cut the crap Hymen! The brave GNU World wants to control your >>> compiler. >> >> "it" obviously means the proprietary, third-party compiler. Your >> reading comprehension appears a bit sub-standard. >> > > To wit: > > "If you have used a proprietary, third-party compiler to build the > software, then you probably cannot ship it to your customers. We > consider the name of the compiler, its exact version number, and > where it can be acquired as information that must be provided as > part of the Corresponding Source." > > My third party compiler is none of their damn business. I can paint > it red, pee on it or give to charity -- it's simply none of their > damn business. The name of the compiler, its version number and > where it can be acquired is also none of their damn business. > "[P]art of the "Corresponding Source" my ass. > > You FOSS groupies are obviously a brick shy of a full load. > > None of their damn business. > None of their damn business. > None of their damn business. > None of their damn business. > None of their damn business. > > Sincerely, > Rjack :)
Idiot -- We are Linux. Resistance is measured in Ohms. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
