TP wrote:
Could you explained me where I am wrong in the interpretation
> of additional term f/ of GPLv3 article 7?
You've got the direction of obligation reversed. When you distribute GPLed material to someone, you may impose extra conditions on yourself; for example, you may promise to fix bugs for one year (presumably because the recipients have paid you for this). Such obligations do not extend to third parties to whom the recipients may further distribute the software, and that must be made clear to the third parties. That's what the clause is saying. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
