Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
> Diebold will presumably offer up a variety of defenses in its court
> papers, and things will go on from there. First of all, is Diebold
> honoring the terms of the GPL for standalone Ghostscript?
"honoring the terms of the GPL for standalone Ghostscript"
Suppose that Diebold doesn't honor the terms of the GPL for "standalone
Ghostscript".
What does that ("honoring the terms of the GPL for standalone
Ghostscript") have to do with the copyright law, Hyman? The GPL is not
the copyright law, don't you agree with that, Hyman?
----
U.S. District Court
California Northern District (San Francisco)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:08-cv-04837-SC
Artifex Software Inc. v. Diebold Inc. et al
Assigned to: Hon. Samuel Conti
Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
----
Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
