>Rjack writes:

>>Aren't you a being a little presumptuous when you simply ignore the
>>doctrine of promissory estoppel when considering a failed license?

>What's the promise here?

Did Rjack ever post an answer to this question?
-- 
Rahul
http://rahul.rahul.net/
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Reply via email to