"amicus_curious" <[email protected]> writes: > "Hyman Rosen" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... >> amicus_curious wrote: >>> The SFLC needs a quick hit so they can get on to the next victim. >> > They cannot afford to be tied up in any real litigation. >> >> That is mere wishful thinking on your part. The purpose of the >> SFLC is to enforce compliance with the GPL. In the Verizon case, >> the source code for the firmware is made available by the >> manufacturer of the router. > > Big deal. The source code for the firmware was already available in > dozens of places. What good is one more snapshot?
It needs to be the corresponding snapshot if you want to debug stuff and/or do incremental changes. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
