amicus_curious wrote:
Well you doubless lack the legal education of the district court judge so the conventional wisdom is that he is more likely to be correct than you.
But he was already found wrong once by the appeals court, so he could be wrong again.
Even so, how do you think that Jacobsen can manage to show "irreparable harm" in regard to Katzer's use of the code?
By showing that Katzer did not honor the terms of the license. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
