Hyman Rosen wrote:
Rjack wrote:
Do you mean those BusyBox "copyright holders" who *cannot* go
to federal court in the Second Circuit seeking redress because
THEY HAVE NO REGISTERED COPYRIGHTS and therefore no standing
to sue?
No judge has dismissed any of these cases yet for the copyright
holders not having standing.
ROFL. . . "no judge" huh? No judge has ever had a chance
to review anything because the SFLC always *voluntarily dismisses*
their own bullshit case before a judge can rule on anything.
THE SFLC WILL NEVER, NEVER VOLUNTARILY ALLOW A JUDGE TO REVIEW THE
MERITS OF THE GPL LICENSE. It's bullshit FSF propaganda Hymen. Which
part of b-u-l-l-s-h-i-t p-r-o-p-a-g-a-n-d-a don't you understand?
Verizon told the SFLC to kiss their Tyrian purple ass and the
SFLC filed a voluntary dismissal WITH PREJUDICE so that Verizon
wouldn't kick their dumb ass all over the courtroom.
While this is what you wish is true, that does not make it true.
Meanwhile, Verizon's router supplier has a very prominent web
page which makes the sources available and prominently features
icons of the free software movement.
Sincerely,
Rjack :)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
