"amicus_curious" <[email protected]> writes: > "Rahul Dhesi" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... >> "amicus_curious" <[email protected]> writes: >> >>>I don't suggest that enforcement itself is the problem, it is the >>>enforcement of meaningless requirements.... >> >> The CAFC has ruled that these requirements are not meaningless. >> -- > They suggested that the requirements were not meaningless to the > copyright holders who get a thrill out of seeing their name in print,
You are confused. The BSD license is about "copyright holders who get a thrill out of seeing their name in print". The GPL license is about copyright holders who get a thrill out of seeing other contributions in code. > but that is meaningless to me. Laws don't depend on you seeing a meaning in them. > I think that it speaks ill of those egomaniacs who want to create such > a ruckus just so that the world might see how smart they are. > Pathetic. Pathetic is not the worst description of your self-contradictory ill-informed ill-judged postings. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
