On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:52:22 -0500, amicus_curious wrote: >> You're begging the question. Your "conclusion" is that the source need >> only be available if it's been modified, and, since the source wasn't >> modified, then it need not be available. >> > I am not arguing the meaning of the text contained in the GPL, I am > saying that, unless the code has been modified in some useful way, then > it is of no value to the community.
So you don't dispute the legality of the GPL? You're just find it inconvenient? If so, then don't distribute GPL'd software and go about your business. -Thufir _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
