On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:55:44 -0500, amicus_curious wrote:

>> The mere fact that you are distributing the software (usually the
>> binaries, or as firmware) requires the distributor to make the source
>> (and the very *same* source for the binaries) available. Failing to do
>> so will put the distributor at odds with copyright law
>>
> No shit, Dick Tracy.  I simply say that is silly.


And if the source isn't available then where's the attribution?  At a 
minimum, sounds like plagiarism.


-Thufir
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Reply via email to