Rjack wrote:
"2(b)
This provision is not in GPLv3, for what that's worth. > Congress forbid this kind of copyright control For some unfathomable reason, you keep pointing to the preemption clause as if it means something to the incorrect ideas you propose. It doesn't. In any case, the fallback provisions of the GPL are that if you cannot distribute under its terms, then you may not distribute at all, so no user will be denied his freedoms because of this.
It is time for you to admit that Congress writes the copyright laws and not socialist zealots like Richard Stallman.
Even socialist zealots are given the exclusive right to control how their copyrighted works are copied and distributed. Your bitterness and resentment of largess in which you may not participate must be gnawing at you painfully. I suggest that since you are incapable of dealing with GPLed software, just pretend it doesn't exist. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
