amicus_curious wrote: > > "David Kastrup" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... >> "amicus_curious" <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> "Thufir Hawat" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>> news:[email protected]... >>>> On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 09:51:24 -0500, amicus_curious wrote: >>>> >>>>> But the BusyBox authors are totally willing to give their work away >>>>> and >>>>> have been doing so for years. The only thing that they are >>>>> hammering their users in regard to is for not publishing the >>>>> acknowledgement and code itself on the user's own site. >>>> >>>> >>>> Exactly, if you choose to distribute *their* work then there are >>>> conditions. What's wrong with that? >>> >>> The conditions are silly and useless, making the authors appear to be >>> the same. >> >> So what? You don't seem to have much of a problem with being silly and >> useless, certainly being much more so than the BusyBox authors. >> > But I am not suing companies for such trivia.
And yet you are the one gloating about how MS would tear anyone to shreds doing similar things with MS software > And you can only muster some > inane slurs in response? He was extremely polite, given your extreme dishonesty > That is pretty lame. The one pretty lame would be you, Bill Weisgerber, with your lame attempts at making GPL an non-issue -- Warning: You have moved the mouse. Windows will reboot now to make the change permanent _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
