"Thufir Hawat" <hawat.thu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:haeql.53381$ci2.43...@newsfe09.iad...
On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 09:41:17 -0500, amicus_curious wrote:
None of the above demonstrate that the file(s) are stored on Verizon
servers, the files could be hosted on Actiontek servers.
With a URL of download.Verizon.net? Perhaps their servers could be
linked behind the scenes, but that would be rather unusual at best. Why
would they do that in lieu of just storing a copy of the download file?
The point is that you've not demonstrated that the files are stored on a
verizon server yet proceed as if you have.
They are accessed via the Verizon webserver. What difference would it make
if they were somehow linked behind the scenes to some server owned by
another company. Do you seriously believe that is the case? It would be
very unusual for Verizon to have back office direct connections to
Actiontec.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
