Doug Mentohl wrote: > > Rjack wrote: > > > The SFLC stated in their FSF v. Cisco Complaint that: > > They still own the copyright ... > > "This is an action by The Free Software Foundation, Inc., a nonprofit > corporation organized under the laws of the State of Massachusetts > (Plaintiff) by and through its attorneys, the Software Freedom Law > Center, Inc., to recover damages arising from infringement of its > copyrights by Cisco Systems, Inc." > > "Plaintiff is, and at all relevant times has been, the copyright holder > under United States copyright law in the Programs. 45. Defendants > distribution of its Infringing Products and Firmware without approval or > authorization by Plaintiff infringes Plaintiffs exclusive copyrights in > the Programs pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 501." > > http://www.fsf.org/licensing/complaint-2008-12-11.pdf
These are allegations from the FSF/SFLC, not the court's holdings. The court won't have a chance to state its disagreements with the FSF/SFLC view on facts and/or legal conclusions because the FSF/SFLC will voluntary dismiss the case just like all previous GPL cases in nysd.uscourts.gov. regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
