Hyman Rosen wrote:
Rjack wrote:
The SFLC has NEVER made a demand that the sources be made
available.
Of course not. Acceptance of the GPL is voluntary, so there can
be no demands for source code. The SFLC sues for copyright
violation. Acceptance and performance under the GPL is something
for the defense to assert.
The SFLC pleaded the GPL license so it's their burden to show
the defendant didn't accept or perform. You can't make up
your own pleading rules as you go along Hyman, like you do with
your imaginary demands. Take your meds Hyman. Go to doctor.
Sincerely,
Rjack :)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
