Rjack wrote: [...] > GPL supporters simply parrot their F.S.F. programmed response. > > Fire up google sometime and attempt to find any citations by the > F.S.F. legal folks supporting their facetious legal claims. (e.g. 'a > license is not a contract').
Well, comrade Moglen is on record: http://www.hindu.com/mp/2007/07/04/stories/2007070450740400.htm ------ What are your reflections on the work with the FSF? What we did was get thousands of people from around the world collaborate on a legal document which replaces law. It establishes an alternative rule set for the entire global environment. If you want to use these rules anywhere on earth you can. It is very important in a global century. What we did was a very early example of 21st century global legislation. ------ IOW this pompous moron pretends that the FSF/SFLC is some sort of global legislative body and judicial authority at the same time. He is insane. Note that the clown also claimed: ------ To increase its popular usage, does free and open source software require good PR? If you are Microsoft, you have to pay money to make software. You have to hire people, buildings, paper clips, telephones, pensions.... Then sell software with salesmen... Then have lawyers to protect the software. We dont have to pay anybody to make the software. Smart people all over the world make our software. Biggest corporations around the world clamour to distribute the software because it is profitable. And we dont have armies of lawyers to protect it because we dont protect it, we just say take it and do good things with it. Just share and share alike. ------ regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
