David Kastrup wrote: [...] > > Man oh man. In all GPL complaints, SFLC and the right holders plead > > "automatic termination" and that just can't possibly happen without > > defendant's acceptance coming first. > > That is just so that the defendant has to pick acceptance or > non-acceptance as his line of reasoning.
Said GNUtian "Huh? You can't be held to a contract you did not sign" dak. Assume defendant's line of reasoning that the contract is in force but its certain provision(s) are void/unenforcable or in alternative that the contract gives rise to the doctrine of copyright misuse making plaintiffs copyrights void/unenforcable "until the misuse has been purged and its effects no longer exist" (voiding the entire contract due to lack of consideration and/or illegality but providing impunity to infringe plaintiff's copyrights). http://digital-law-online.info/lpdi1.0/treatise15.html regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
